References
Ackermann, E. (1991). From Decontextualized to Situated Knowledge: Revisiting Piaget's Water-Level Experiment. in Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (pp. 269-294).
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s Constructionism: What’s the difference? Retrieved 16th November, 2012 from: http://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf
Alexander, R. (Ed.) (2010). Children, their World, their Education. London: Routledge.
Altrichter, H. & Holly, M.L. (2005). Research Diaries. in Somekh, B. & Lewin, C. (Eds.) Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE. (pp. 24-32).
Anderson, G. (1998). Fundamentals of Educational Research. (2nd ed.) London: Falmer Press.
Anderson, G., Herr, K. & Nihlen, A.S. (2007). Studying your own School. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Anderson, R. S. & Speck. B. W. (2001). Using Technology in K-8 Literacy Classrooms. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Allen, J. (2004). Searching for Hidden Potatoes! Social Research in Education. in J. Allen (Ed.) Sociology of Education; possibilities and practices, 3rd edn. Melbourne: Social Science Press. (pp. 3-28).
Arhar, J.M., Holly, M.L. & Kasten, W.C. (2001). Action Research for Teachers: Travelling the Yellow Brick Road. Upper Sadle River (NJ): Merill Prentice Hall.
Aubusson, P.J., Harrison. A.G. & Ritchie, S.M. (Eds.) (2006). Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Aulls, M. W. (2002). The contributions of co-occurring forms of classroom discourse and academic activities to curriculum events and instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 520-538.
Baars, B.J. (1998). Consciousness and Attention in the Brain: A Global Workspace Approach. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 33(1), 86-87.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of Human Memory. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Banks, D.A. (2003). Belief, Inquiry, Argument and Reflection as Significant Issues in Learning about Information Systems Development Methodologies. in T. McGill (Ed.) Current Issues in IT Education. London: IRM Press. (pp. 1-10).
Barab, S. & Squire, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
Bazerman, C. (2012). Writing with Concepts: Communal, Internalized, and Externalized. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 259-272.
Bearne, E. & Wolstencroft, H. (2007). Visual Approaches to Teaching Writing. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M.
(1993). Surpassing Ourselves:
An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise.
Chicago: Open Court.
Berk, R. A. (2011). Research on PowerPoint®: From basic features to multimedia. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 24-35.
Berliner, D.C. (2002). Educational Research: The Hardest Science of All. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
Betrancourt, M. & Chassot, A. (2008). Making Sense of Animation. in Lowe, R. & Schnotz, W. (Eds.) Learning with Animation. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 141-164).
Bigge, M.L. & Shermis, S.S.
(1999). Learning Theories for Teachers (6th ed.) New
York: Longman.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Blunden, A. (2009). An Interdisciplinary Theory of Activity. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 11(1), 1-26.
Blunden, A. (2010). An Interdisciplinary Theory of Activity. Leiden: Brill
Blunden, A. (2012). Concepts - A Critical Approach. Leiden: Brill.
Brohm, R. (2009). A Sense of Participation: Proximity in Action Research. Paper presented at the OLKC conference, Amsterdam, 2009. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Brooks, M.L. (2002). Drawing to Learn. Unpublished PhD thesis. Alberta: University of Alberta, Canada. (available at http://www.une.edu.au/Drawing/main.html accessed 040412).
Broudy, H. S. (1977). How Basic is Aesthetic Education? or Is it the Fourth R? Language Arts, 54(6), 631-637.
Brown, D.G. (Ed.) (2000). Interactive Learning. Bolton: Anker Publishing Company.
Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Bullen, E., Robb, S., & Kenway, J., (2004). 'Creative destruction': Knowledge economy policy and the future of the Arts and Humanities in the Academy. Journal of Education Policy, 19(1), 3-22.
Burn, A. & Parker, D. (2003). Tiger's Big Plan: Multimodality and the Moving Image. Jewitt, C. & Kress, G. (Eds.) Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang. (pp. 56-72).
Burns, R. (1997). Introduction to Research Methods (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman.
Burnaford, G. Fischer, J. &
Hobson, D. (Eds.) (2001). Teachers Doing Research (2nd
ed.) Mahwah (New Jersey): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Callon, M. (1992). The Dynamics of Techno-Economic Networks. In Cooms, R., Saviotti, P. & Walsh, V. (Eds.), Technological Change and Company Strategies. London: Academic Press.
Canemaker, J. (1999). Paper Dreams - The Art and Artists of Disney Storyboards. New York: Hyperion.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge (MA): Bradford.
Chandler, P., O’Brien, A. & Unsworth, L. (2010). Towards a 3D digital multimodal curriculum for the upper primary school. Australian Educational Computing, 25(1), 34-40.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991).
Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A
Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London:
SAGE.
Chen, W.F. & Dwyer, F. (2003). Hypermedia Research: Present and Future. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(2), 143-148.
Chi, M.T.H. (2008). Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge. (pp. 61-82).
Clement, J. (2008). The Role of Explanatory Models in Teaching for Conceptual Change. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge. (pp. 417-452).
Cole, M. (2011). Book review: Blunden, A. (2010). An Interdisciplinary Theory of Activity. Critical Practice Studies, 13(1), 46-52.
Colwell, R. & Richardson, C.,
(Eds.) (2002). The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching
and Learning. New York: Oxford.
Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V.P. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (Eds.) (2010). Vygotsky and Creativity. New York: Peter Lang.
Conrad, C.F. & Serlin, R.C. (Eds.) (2006). The SAGE Handbook for Research in Education: Engaging Ideas and Enriching Enquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
Cooper, R.G. (1990). Stage-Gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products. Business Horizons. May-June 1990. 44-53.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
Darling, I. (1998).
Davis, R., Shrobe, H. & Szolovits, P. (1993). What is a Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine, 14(1), 17-33.
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of Generalization in Instruction: Logical and Psychological Problems in Structuring of School Curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Deloache, J.S. & Burns, N.M. (1993). Symbolic Development in Young Children: Understanding Models and Pictures. in Pratt, C. & Garton, A.F. (Eds.) Systems of Representation in Children - Development and Use. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. (pp. 91-112).
De Lange, N., Olivier, T. & Wood, L. (2008). Participatory Video Documentary: Just for Whom? Education as Change, 12(2), 109-122.Denzin, N.K. (1987). On Semiotics and Symbolic Interactionism. Symbolic Interaction, 10(1), 1-19.
Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. (2nd ed.) London: SAGE.
Devlin, A.S. (2006). Research
Methods – Planning, Conducting and Presenting Research.
Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
Dewey, J. (1910/1997). How We Think. New York: Dover Publications.
Diakidoy, I.N. & Kendeou, P. (2001). Faciliating Conceptual Change in Astronomy: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Instructional Approaches. Learning and Instruction 11, 1-20).
Dicks, B., Mason, B., Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (2005). Qualitative Research and Hypermedia: Ethnography for the Digital Age. London: SAGE.
diSessa, A.A . (2008). A Bird's-Eye View of the "Pieces" vs. "Coherence" Controversy (From the "Pieces" Side of the Fence). Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge. (pp. 35-60).
Dixon-Krauss, L. (Ed.) (1996). Vygotsky in the Classroom. New York: Longman.
Donald, J. (2002). Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dowling, P. & Brown, A. (2010). Doing Research / Reading Research. (2nd ed.) London: Routledge.
Dron, J. (2012) The Pedagogical-technological Divide and the Elephant in the Room. International Journal on E-Learning, 11(1), 23-38.
Drotner, K. (2008). Leisure Is Hard Work: Digital Practices and Future Competencies. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Buckingham, D. (Ed.) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (pp. 167-184).
Dugan, J. (1999). Hypertext: A Definitional Quandary. Educational Computing in the Schools: Technology, Communication and Literacy. Blanchard, J (Ed.) New York: The Haworth Press.
Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and Recognition in Vision. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Edgar, P. (2009 May). Why intelligence can be taught. Shine, 1(4), Melbourne: DEECD. 28.
Eisenhart. M. (2001). Changing Conceptions of Culture and Ethnographic Methodology: Recent Thematic Shifts and their Implications for Research on Teaching. in Richardson, V. (Ed.) Handbook of Research in Teaching. (4th ed.) Washington DC: AERA. (pp. 209-225).
Eisner, E. W. (1982). Cognition and Curriculum: A Basis for Deciding what to Teach. New York: Longman.Eisner, E. W. (1998). The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Elliott, A. (Ed.) (2010). Routledge Companion to Social Theory. New York: Routledge.
Ellis, A.K. (2005). Research on Educational Innovations. (4th ed.), New York: Eye on Education.
Ellis, S. (2012 April). Does Reading Affect Our Social Behaviour? PlaneTree,18(1), The University of Melbourne Graduate Student Association. 10-12.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative Learning in Work Teams: Analysing Cycles of Knowledge Creation in Practice. in Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R. (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 377-406).
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-155.
Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to Work: The Change Laboratory as an Application of Double Stimulation. Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J.V. (Eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 363-382).
Engeström, Y. & Glăveanu, V. (2012). On Third Generation Activity Theory: Interview With Yrjö Engeström. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 515-518.
Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (1996). Introduction: Studying Work as Mindful Practice. Cognition and Communication at Work. Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (Eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 1-14).
Engeström, Y. & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. in Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R. (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 1-16).
Engeström, Y., Nummijoki, J. & Sannino, A. (2012). Embodied Germ Cell at Work: Building an Expansive Concept of Physical Mobility in Home Care. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 287-309.
Engeström, Y., Pasanen, A., Toiviainen, H., & Haavisto, V. (2005). Expansive Learning as Collaborative Concept Formation at Work. In K. Yamazumi, Y. Engeström, & H. Daniels (Eds.) New Learning Challenges: Going Beyond the Industrial Age System of School and Work. Osaka: Kansai University Press. (pp. 47–77).
Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2012). Concept Formation in the Wild. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 201-206.
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J. & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a Tool for Transforming Work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10-17.
Erickson, L. (2002). Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction. Thousand Oaks (CA): Corwin Press.
Erickson, L. (2007). Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom. Thousand Oaks (CA): Corwin Press.
Ferholt, B. (2010). A Synthetic-Analytic Method for the Study of Perezhivanie: Vygotsky's Literary Analysis Applied to Playworlds. in Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V.P. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (Eds.) Vygotsky and Creativity. New York: Peter Lang. (pp. 163-179).
Few, S. (2006). Information Dashboard Design: The Effective Visual Communication of Data. Cambridge (MA): O'Reilly.
Fichtner, B. (1999). Metaphor and Learning Activity. in Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R. (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 314-324).
Fleurke, N. (2011). Imaging the Storyboard: On Networks, Concepts and Communication. International Journal of the Image, 1(3), 155-162.
Floridi, L. (2011). A Defence of Constructionism: Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering. Metaphilosophy, 42(3), 282-304.
Ford, M. & Forman, E.A. (2006). Research on Instruction and Learning in Science: Elaborating the Design Approach. in Conrad, C.F. & Serlin, R.C. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook for Research in Education: Engaging Ideas and Enriching Enquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE publications. (pp. 139-156).
Fowler, H.W. & Fowler, F.G.,
(Eds.) (1964). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current
English (5th ed.) London: Oxford University Press.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy and Civic Courage. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield.
Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into Science. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Galotti, K.M. (2011). Cognitive Development. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Gangwer, T. (2009). Visual Impact, Visual Teaching (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
Gardenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual Spaces as a Framework for Knowledge Representation. Mind and Matter, 2(2), 9-27.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed. New York: Basic Books.
Gargarian, G. (1991). Towards a Constructionist Musicology. in Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (pp. 311-334).
Gargarian, G. (1996). The Art of Design. in Kafai, Y. & Resnick, M. (Eds.). Constructionism in Practice. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (pp. 125-159).
Garton, A.F. (1993). Representation in Problem Solving. in Pratt, C. & Garton, A.F. (Eds.) Systems of Representation in Children - Development and Use. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. (pp. 251-269).
Gee, J.P. (2003). What Video Games have to Teach us about Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibson, J.J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. in Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (Eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Society. Hillsdale (N.J.): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (pp. 67-82).
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Giest, H. (2008). The Formation Experiment in the Age of Hypermedia and Distance Learning. in Van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E. & Van Der Veer, R. (Eds.) The Transformation of Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 100-126).
Gilbert, J. K. (2007). (Ed.) Visualization in Science Education. Netherlands: Springer.
Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education. in Gilbert, J.K. (Ed.) Visualization in Science Education. Netherlands: Springer. (pp. 9-27).
Gill, J. (1996). Beyond the baby and the bathwater: Reflections on current debates in Educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 23(21), 31-46.
Gobert, J.D. & Clement, J.J. (1999). Effects of Student-Generated Diagrams versus Student-Generated Summaries on Conceptual Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39-53.
Goodman, K.S. (1967). Reading: A Psycholinguistic Guessing Game. Journal of the Reading Specialist. 6(4), 126-135.
Godinho, S. & Wilson, J. (2005). Portfolios for a Purpose. in Hay, T. & Moss, J. (Eds.) Portfolios, Performance and Authenticity. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Prentice Hall. (pp. 1-24).
Goldman, S.R. (2008). Animating the Issues for Research on Animation. in Lowe, R. & Schnotz, W. (Eds.) Learning with Animation. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 357-370).
Goldman-Segall, R. (1998). Points of viewing children’s thinking: A digital ethnographer’s journey. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gordon, D.T. (2003). Better
Learning and Teaching in the Digital Classroom. Cambridge:
Harvard Education Press.
Goswami, U. (Ed.) (2011). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Green, T.F. (1993). Learning without Metaphor. in Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2nd ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 610-620).
Greene, M. (1988). The Dialectic of Freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Greeno, J.G. (1994). Gibson's Affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336-342.
Greeno, J.G. (2012). Concepts in Activities and Discourses. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 310-313.
Greenfield, T. (Ed.) (2002). Research
Methods for Post Graduates (2nd ed). London: Arnold.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1999). Naturalistic and Rationalistic Enquiry. in Keeves, J.P. & Lakomski, G. (Eds.) Issues in Educational Research. New York: Pergamon. (pp. 141-149).
Gutl, C. & Pivec, M. (2003). A Multimedia Knowledge Module Virtual Tutor Fosters Interactive Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(2), (pp. 231-258).Hackbarth, S. (1996). The Educational Technology Handbook. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publishing.
Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of Networked Experience – Professional and Educational Perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Hakkarainen, P. & Bredikyte, M. (2008). The Zone of Proximal Development in Play and Learning. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 2-11.
Hannafin, M., Land, S. & Oliver, K. (1999). Open Learning Environments: Foundations, Methods, and Models. in C. Reigeluth (Ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models (Vol. 2). Mahwah (NJ.): Erlbaum. (pp. 115-140).
Harel, I. (1991). The Silent Observer and Holistic Note Taker. in Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (pp. 449-465).
Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.) (1991). Constructionism. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Secondary Students' Mental Models of Atoms and Molecules: Implications for Teaching Science. Science Education, 80. 509-534.
Harste, J.C. (2010). Multimodality. in Albers, P. & Sanders, J. (Eds.) Literacies, the Arts & Multimodality. Urbana (Illinois): NCTE. (27-43).
Helme, S. & Clarke, D. (2001). Identifying Cognitive Engagement in the Mathematics Classroom. Mathematics Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 133-153.
Henderson, M. et. al. (2010). Students creating digital video in the primary classroom: student autonomy, learning outcomes, and professional learning communities. Australian Educational Computing - Journal of the Australian Council for computers in education, 24(2), 12-20.
Hewitt, J.P. (2007). Self and Society. (10th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Higgins, S. & Packard. N. (2004). Meeting the standards in primary ICT. London: Routledge Falmer.
Holton, D. & Thomas, G. (2001). Mathematical interactions and their influence on learning, in Clarke, D.J. (Ed.), Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (pp. 75-104).
Holton, D. & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, (37)2, 127-143.
Holyoak, K.J. & Morrison, R.G. (Eds.) (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
House, E.R. & Howe, K.R. (2000). Values in Education and Social Research. London: SAGE.
Hubscher-Younger, T. & Narayanan. N.H. (2008). Turning the Tables: Investigating Characteristics and Efficacy of Student-Authored Animations and Multimedia Representations. in Lowe, R. & Schnotz, W. (Eds.) Learning with Animation. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 235-259).
Hutchins, E. (2012). Concepts in Practice as Sources of Order. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 314-323.
Jacobs, B. (2007). Animating Best Practice. www.brendanpauljacobs.com/abpindex.htm
Janesick, V.J. (2000). The Choreography of Qualitative Research Design: Minuets, Improvisations and Crystallization. in Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. (2nd ed.) London: SAGE. (pp. 379-400).
Jenkins, L. (2003). Improving
Student Learning - Applying Deming's Quality Principles in
Classrooms (2nd ed.), Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241-267.
Jewitt, C. & Kress, G. (Eds.) (2003). Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
John-Steiner, V. (1985). Notebooks of the Mind: Explorations of Thinking. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
John-Steiner, V. (1995). Cognitive Pluralism: A Sociocultural Approach. Mind, Culture and Activity, 2(1), 2-11.
John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, D.L., Maddux, C.D. & Liu, L. (Eds.) (2000). Integration of Technology into the Classroom - Case Studies. New York: The Haworth Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Designing Structured Hypertext and Structuring Access to Hypertext. Educational Technology, 28(2), 13-16.
Jonassen, D. H. (2008). Model Building for Conceptual Change. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge. (pp. 676-693).
Jonson, B. (2005). Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age. Design Studies, 26(6), 613-624.
Joyce, B. & Calhoun, E. (1998).
Learning to Teach Inductively. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kafai, Y. & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in Practice. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kapitzke, C. (2001). 'E-literacies
and Cybaries' in Capra, S. & Ryan, J. (2002). Problems
are the solution. Capalba: Capra Ryan & Associates.
Kearsley, G. (1988). Authoring Considerations for Hypertext. Educational Technology, 28(11), 21-24.
Keen, A. (2007). The Cult of the Amateur. New York: Random House.
Keil, F.C. (2006). Explanation and Understanding. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 227-254.
Keil, F.C. & Newman, G.E. (2008). Two Tales of Conceptual Change: What Changes and What Remains the Same. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge. (pp. 83-101).
Kelly, A.E. (2004). Design Research in Education: Yes, but is it Methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
Kemmis, S. (1995). Action Research and Communicative Action: Changing Teacher Practices and the Organisation of Educational Work. Melbourne: Unpublished.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Knobel, M. & Lankshear, C. (Eds.) (2007). A New Literacies Sampler. New York: Peter Lang.
Koehler, M. (2011). Author's website www.tpack.org (accessed July 5th 2012).
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Kovalchick, A. & Dawson, K. (2004). Education and Technology - An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Kress, G. (2003). IIID Expert Forum for Knowledge Presentation. Preparing for the Future of Knowledge Conference. 31st May 2003. Chicago. Keynote address. Abstract vs Concrete Representations. http://www.knowledgepresentation.org/BuildingTheFuture/Kress1/Kress1Quicktime/Kress1Movie.html (accessed 24/02/2012).
Kress, G. & Mavers, D. (2005). Social Semiotics and Multimodal Texts. in Somekh, B. & Lewin, C. (Eds.) Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE. (pp. 172-179).
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langer, S. K. (1957). Philosophy in a New Key. (3rd ed.) Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Lather, P. (1999). To Be of Use: The Work of Reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2-7.
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the Missing Masses? Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In Bijker, W.E., & Law, J. (Eds.) Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (pp. 225-258).
Law, J. (2007) Making a Mess with Method in Outhwaite, W. & Turner, S.P. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Metholdology. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. (pp. 595-606).
Lee, B. (1985). Intellectual Origins of Vygotsky's Semiotic Analysis. In. Wertsch, J.V. (Ed.) Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 66-93).
Lei, J., Conway, P.F. & Zhao. Y. (2008). The Digital Pencil. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Leiman, M. (1999). The Concept of Sign in the Work of Vygotsky, Winnicott, and Bakhtin: Further Integration of Object Relations Theory and Activity Theory. in Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R. (Eds.) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 419-434).
Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Levie, W.H. & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30(4), 195-232.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Loveless, A. & Taylor, T. (2000). Creativity, Visual Literacy and ICT. in Leask, M. & Meadows, J. (Eds.) Teaching and Learning with ICT in the Primary School. London: Routledge Falmer. (pp. 65-80).
Lowe, R. (2001). 'Beyond "Eye-Candy": Improving Learning with Animation. Apple University Consortium. (http://auc.uow.edu.au/conf/conf01/downloads/AUC2001_Lowe.pdf)
Lowe, R. & Schnotz, W. (Eds.) (2008). Learning with Animation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lupton, E. & Miller, A. (1996). Design Writing Research - Writing on Graphic Design. London: Phaidon.
Lynch, G & Fleming, D. (2007).
Emerging technologies
MacCannell, D. (1986). Keeping Symbolic Interaction Safe from Semiotics: A Response to Harman. Symbolic Interaction, 9(1), 161-168.
Manning, P. (2001). Semiotics, Semantics and Ethnography. in Atkinson, P.A., Delamont, S., Coffey, A., Lofland, J. & Lofland, L.H. (Eds.) Handbook of Ethnography. London: SAGE. (pp. 145-159).
Manning, P. (2003). Semiotics, Pragmatism and Narratives. in Reynolds, L.T. & Herman-Kinney, N.J. Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira Press. (pp. 1021-1039).
Manning, P. & Smith, G. (2010). Symbolic Interactionism. in Elliott, A. (Ed.) Routledge Companion to Social Theory. New York: Routledge. (pp. 37-55).
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Mayer, R.E. (1993). The Instructive Metaphor. in Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2nd ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 561-578).
Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R.E. (2005). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. in Mayer, R.E. (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGrath, J., Karabas, G., & Willis. J. (2011). From TPACK concept to TPACK practice: An analysis of the suitability and usefulness of the concept as a guide in the real world of teacher development. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.McKay, H. & Dudley, B. (1996). About Storytelling. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.
Meadows, J. & Leask, M. (2000). Why use ICT? in Teaching and Learning with ICT in the Primary School. London: Routledge Falmer. (pp. 1-19).
Medin, D.L. & Rips, L.J. (2005). Concepts and Categories: Memory, Meaning, and Metaphysics. in Holyoak, K.J. & Morrison, R.G. (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 37-72).
Mercer, N. & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the Dialogic Processes of Teaching and Learning: The Value and Potential of Sociocultural Theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12-21.
Mertens, D.M. (2011). Publishing Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 3-6.
Michelson, A. (1993). Drawing into Film: Director's Drawings. New York: The Pace Gallery 1993 exhibition catalogue.
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical
number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for
processing information. Psychological Review, 63,
81-97.
Miller, J. (1995). Trick or treat? The autobiography of the question. English Quarterly, 27(3), 22-26.
Minsky, M. (1985). The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.
Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Smith, A. & Stuart, J. (2011). Picturing Research: An Introduction. Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A. & Stuart, J. (Eds.) Picturing Research: Drawing as Visual Methodology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. (pp. 1-16).
Mitchell, C., de Lange, N. & Moletsane, R. (2011). Before the Cameras Roll: Drawing Storyboards to Address Gendered Poverty. Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A. & Stuart, J. (Eds.) Picturing Research: Drawing as Visual Methodology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. (pp. 219-231).
Moore, P. & Fitz, C. (1993). Gestalt theory and instructional design. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23(2), 137-157.
Moran, S. (2010). Commitment and Creativity: Transforming Experience into Art. in Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V.P. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (Eds.) Vygotsky and Creativity. New York: Peter Lang. (pp. 141-160).
Morse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press.
Moss, J. (Ed.) (2008). Researching Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mousavi, S., Low, R. & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
Mullins, P. (2009 May). Q & A with Patricia Mullins. Shine, 1(11), Melbourne: DEECD. (49).
Munro, R. (1999). Information and Communication Technology. in Bryce, T.G.K. & Humes, W.M. (Eds.) Scottish Education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (pp. 550-557).
Nersessian, N.J. (2012). Engineering Concepts: The Interplay between Concept Formation and Modeling Practices in Bioengineering Sciences. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 222-239.
Noffke, S. & Somekh, B. (2005). Action Research. in Somekh, B. & Lewin, C. (Eds.) Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE. (pp. 89-96).
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 5-34.
Norris, N. & Walker, R. (2005). Naturalistic Inquiry. in Somekh, B. & Lewin, C. (Eds.) Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE. (pp. 131-137).
Oliver, K. (2009). Storyboards...An unauthorised biography. Retrieved from the Event Videographer's Resource website: http://www.eventdv.net/Articles/News/Feature/Storyboards-...-An-Unauthorized-Biography-37787.htm
Oliver, P. (2003). The
Student’s Guide to Research Ethics. Maidenhead: Open
University Press.
Oreck, B. & Nicoll, J. (2010). Dance Dialogues: Creating and Teaching in the Zone of Proximal Development. in Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V.P. & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (Eds.) Vygotsky and Creativity. New York: Peter Lang. (pp. 107-124).
Ortony, A. (Ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought. (2nd ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press.
Osbourne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science: The Implications of Children's Science. Hong Kong: Heinemann.
Özdemir, G. & Clark, D.B. (2007). An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 351-361.
Paley, G. P. (2007). On Listening to What the Children Say. Harvard Educational Review, 77(2), 152-163.
Papert. S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1991). Perestroika and Epistemological Politics. in Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (pp. 13-28).
Papert, S. (1993). The Children's Machine. New York: Basic Books.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perkins, D.N. (1986). Knowledge as Design. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
Peterson, R. & Herrington, J. (2005). The state of the art of design-based research. http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/59
Petrie, H.G. (1979). Metaphor and Learning. in Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 438-469).
Petrie, H.G. & Oshlag, R.S. (1993). Metaphor and Learning. in Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2nd ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 579-609).
Piaget, J. (1977). Studies in Reflecting Abstraction. Sussex: Pschology Press.
Pinar, W.F (Ed.) (2003). International Handbook of Curriculum Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Poole, M. (1995). Beliefs and Values in Science Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Pratt, C. & Garton, A.F.
(1993). Systems of Representation in Children. in Pratt, C.
& Garton, A.F. (Eds.) Systems
of Representation in Children - Development and Use.
Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. (pp. 1-9).
Quinlan, P. & Dyson, B. (2008). Cognitive Psychology. Harlow (UK): Pearson.
Rapp, D. (2007). Mental Models: Theoretical Issues for Visualizations in Science Education. in Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.) Visualization in Science Education. Netherlands: Springer. (pp. 43-60).
Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive Architectures for Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 87-98.
Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.) (1987). Instructional Theories in Action. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Resnick, M. (2007). All I really need to know (about creative thinking) I learned (by studying how children learn) in kindergarten. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition, June 13-15, 2007, Washington, DC, USA. (pp. 1-6).
Reynolds, L.T. & Herman-Kinney, N.J. Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira Press.
Richardson, L. & St. Pierre, E. A. (2010). Writing: A Method of Inquiry. in Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. (3rd ed.) Los Angeles: SAGE publications. (pp. 473-500).
Rieber, L.P. (1996). Animation as a Distractor to Learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23(1), 53-57.
Robinson, D.H., Katayama, A.D.,
Dubois, N.F., & Devaney, T., (1998). Interactive effects of
graphic organizers and delayed review on concept application. Journal
of Experimental Education, 67(1), 17-31.
Roediger, H.L., Capaldi, E.D., Paris, S.G., Polivy, J. & Herman, C.P. (1996). Psychology. (4th ed). New York: West Publishing Company.
Rogers, Y. (2008). A Comparison of How Animation Has Been Used. in Lowe, R. & Schnotz, W. (Eds.) Learning with Animation. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 286-303).
Ronnerman, K. (2005). Participant Knowledge and the Meeting of Practitioners and Researchers. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 13(3), 291-311.
Rozenblit, L. R, & Keil, F. C. (2002). The Misunderstood Limits of Folk Science: An Illusion of Explanatory Depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521-62.
Ruffini, M. F. (2009). Creating Animations in PowerPoint to Support Student Learning and Engagement. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32(4), 1-4.
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson's University Library.
Sanders, J. (2010). Relationships between Artistic and Written Composing: A Qualitative Study of Fourth-Grade Students' Composing Experiences. in Albers, P. & Sanders, J. (Eds.) Literacies, the Arts & Multimodality. Urbana (Illinois): NCTE. (pp. 110-135).
Sandoval, W.A. & Bell, P. (2004). Design-Based Research Methods for Studying Learning in Context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199-201.
Saye, J.W. & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding Critical Reasoning about History and Social Issues in Multimedia-supported Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96.
Scholz, R.W. & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded Case Study Methods - Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2004). Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curriculum with student-generated video. (http://www.ed-dev.uts.edu.au/teachered/research/dvproject/home.html Accessed 24/07/2010).
Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. In Stake, R. E. (Ed.) Curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally. (pp. 39-55).
Searle, J.R. (1978). Literal Meaning. Erkenntis, 13(1), 207-224.
Shah, P. & Miyake. A. (Eds.) (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shanon, B. (1993). The Representational and the Presentational. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L. & Rust, F. (2005). Assessment. in Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds.) Preparing Teacher for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (pp. 275-326).
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Siegel, M. (1995). More than Words: The Generative Power of Transmediation for Learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20(4). 455-475.
Sigel, I.E. (1978). The Development of Pictoral Comprehension. In Randhawa, B.S. & Coffmann, W.E. (Eds.) Visual Learning, Thinking, and Communication. New York: Academic Press. (pp. 93-111).
Simons, K. & Klein, J. (2007). The Impact of Scaffolding and Student Achievement Levels in a Problem-based Learning Environment. Instructional Science, 35(1), (pp. 41-72).
Somekh, B. & Lewin, C. (Eds.) (2005). Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: SAGE.
Soegaard, M. (2010). Affordances. Retrieved 31st May 2012 from http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/affordances.html
Sperling, R.A., Seyedmonir, M., Aleksic, M. & Meadows, G. (2003). Animations as Learning Tools in Authentic Science Materials. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(2), 213-221.
Star, S. L. (1996). Working Together: Symbolic Interactionism, Activity Theory, and Information Systems. Cognition and Communication at Work. Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (Eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 296-318).
Steiff, J. (2005). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Independent Filmmaking. New York: Alpha Books.
Sticht, T.G. (1993). Educational uses of Metaphor. in Ortony, A. (Ed.) Metaphor and Thought. (2nd ed.) New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 621-632).
Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a Semiotics-based Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 16(3), 247-257.
Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Sullivan, G. (2006). Research Acts in Arts Practice. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 19-35.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER press.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding: An Inquiry into the Aims of Science. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
Turkle, S. & Papert, S. (1991). Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. in Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (pp. 161-192).
Tversky, B. (2007). Prolegomenon to Scientific Visualizations. in Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.) Visualization in Science Education. Netherlands: Springer. (pp. 29-42).
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Mackenzie, R., Lozano, S. & Morrison, J. (2008). Enriching Animations. in Lowe, R. & Schnotz, W. (Eds.) Learning with Animation. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 263-285).
Tversky, B., Morrison, J.B. & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it Facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Systems, 57, 247-262.
Vaille, J.A. (Ed.) (1998). Guidelines for the Evaluation of Instructional Technology Resources. California: Stanislaus County Office of Education.
Van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E. & Van Der Veer, R. (Eds.) (2008). The Transformation of Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vere, S.A. (1980). Multilevel Counterfactuals for Generalizations of Relational Concepts and Productions. Artificial Intelligence, 14, 139-164.
Vincent, J.T. (2004). Computer mediated multimodal text production: Ten-year-olds crossing semiotic boundaries. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Melbourne.
Virkkunen, J. & Ristimäki, P. (2012). Double Stimulation in Strategic Concept Formation: An Activity-Theoretical Analysis of Business Planning in a Small Technology Firm. Mind, Culture and Activity, 19(3), 273-286.
Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) (2008). International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. (1925/1971). The Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1987). Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1. Rieber, R.W. & Carton, A.S. (Eds.) New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1997). Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 3. Rieber, R.W. & Wollock, J. (Eds.) New York: Plenum Press.
Wagner, J. (2006). Visible materials, visualised theory and images of social research. Visual Studies, 21(1), 55-69.
Wainwright, S. (2002). Teaching and Assessing Skills in Computer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walford, G. (Ed.) (1998). Doing Research about Education. London: Falmer Press.
Wallace, D.S., Wandell, S., West, C., Ware, A., & Dansereau, D.F., (1998). The effect of knowledge maps that incorporate Gestalt principles of learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 67(1), 5-16.Walker, D.F., (2003). Fundamentals of Curriculum (2nd ed.), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The "Boy Turn" in Research on Gender and Education. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471-498.
Weiner, B. (1991). Metaphors in Motivation and Attribution. American Psychologist, 46(9), 921-930.
Wellington, J. (2000). Educational Research - Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches. London: Continuum.
Wells, G. (2007). Semiotic Mediation, Dialogue and the Construction of Knowledge. Human Development, 50(5), 244-274.
Wells, G. (2011). Integrating CHAT and Action Research. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(2), 161-180.
Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract Meditations on the Concrete. in Harel, I. & Papert, S. (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (pp. 193-203).
Wilson, J. (1999). Defining Metacognition: A step towards recognising metacognition as a worthwhile part of the curriculum. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, Melbourne, 1999. Department of Learning and Educational Development. The University of Melbourne.
Wilson, J. & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the Modelling of Mathematical Metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25-48.
Wilson, J. & Johnson, P. (2002). Students Thinking about their Learning. Education Research Quarterly, 24(2), 10-20.
Wilson, J. & Murdoch, K. (2008). Learning for themselves. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.
Wiser, M. & Smith, C.L. (2008). Learning and Teaching about Matter in Grades K-8: When Should the Atomic-Molecular Theory be Introduced? Vosniadou, S. (Ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. New York: Routledge. (pp. 205-239).Wood, D.J., Bruner, J.S. & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
Wright, S. (2010). Understanding Creativity in Early Childhood. London: SAGE.Yao, Y.Y. (2004). Concept Formation and Learning: A Cognitive Informatics Perspective. Third IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (pp. 42-51).
Yates, L. (2004). What does Good Educational Research Look Like? (Conducting Educational Research). Maidenhead: Open University Press.